Fix docker build #32
Fix docker build #32
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the GitHub Actions workflow, Dockerfile, and Makefile to enhance build flexibility and configuration. The workflow now includes a Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant PR as Pull Request
participant Workflow as GitHub Actions
participant Docker as Docker Build
participant Babel as Babel Update
PR ->> Workflow: Trigger workflow
Workflow ->> Docker: Conditional build
alt Not Pull Request
Docker ->> Docker: Push image
else Pull Request
Docker ->> Docker: Build only
end
Workflow ->> Babel: Update translations
Babel -->> Workflow: Complete update
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #32 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 79.75% 78.87% -0.89%
==========================================
Files 109 110 +1
Lines 6689 6765 +76
==========================================
+ Hits 5335 5336 +1
- Misses 1354 1429 +75 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/build-image.yml (2)
41-44: Consider uncommenting workflow_dispatch tag.The workflow_dispatch tag type is commented out but the SHA is still included. Consider uncommenting for consistency:
tags: | type=ref,event=pr type=ref,event=tag,pattern={{raw}} - # type=ref,event=workflow_dispatch + type=ref,event=workflow_dispatch type=sha,event=workflow_dispatch
53-53: Consider optimizing cache configuration.The cache configuration could be improved:
- The push condition affects cache generation
- Cache modes could be conditional on event type
- push: ${{ github.event_name != 'pull_request' }} + push: ${{ github.event_name != 'pull_request' }} cache-from: - type=gha + type=gha,scope=${{ github.ref_name }}-${{ github.workflow }} cache-to: - type=gha + type=gha,mode=max,scope=${{ github.ref_name }}-${{ github.workflow }}Also applies to: 56-59
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/workflows/build-image.yml(3 hunks)Dockerfile(1 hunks)Makefile(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
Dockerfile (1)
16-16: LGTM! Verify binary path exists.
The change to use /usr/local/bin as BIN_PREFIX is correct for the Docker context since we don't need/want a virtualenv inside the container. This aligns with container best practices.
✅ Verification successful
The change to use /usr/local/bin as BIN_PREFIX is correct and verified
The verification confirms that:
flask-babeland its dependencybabelare properly listed in requirements.txt- The Makefile has babel-related targets that use
pybabelcommands - Since the base image is python:3.11, pip will install executables to
/usr/local/binby default
The change aligns with container best practices by using the system-wide Python installation path instead of a virtualenv.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify pybabel is installed in the correct location
rg -l "pybabel" requirements.txt && echo "pybabel is a requirement"
Length of output: 32
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if Babel is mentioned in any requirements files or setup files
fd -e txt -e in requirements && cat $(fd -e txt -e in requirements)
# Also check for any Makefile targets related to babel
fd Makefile && cat $(fd Makefile) | grep -A 3 "babel"
Length of output: 3837
Makefile (2)
3-4: LGTM! Good default for local development.
The addition of BIN_PREFIX with default venv/bin maintains existing behavior for local development while allowing override for different environments (like Docker).
49-53: Verify all babel commands use BIN_PREFIX consistently.
The babel commands have been updated to use $(BIN_PREFIX), making them configurable.
✅ Verification successful
All babel commands consistently use BIN_PREFIX
The verification confirms that all pybabel commands in the Makefile correctly use $(BIN_PREFIX). No hardcoded paths were found, and all three babel commands (extract, update, and compile) consistently use the configurable prefix.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify no hardcoded venv/bin paths remain in babel commands
rg "venv/bin/pybabel" Makefile
Length of output: 30
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any pybabel commands in the Makefile to verify consistent usage of BIN_PREFIX
rg "pybabel" Makefile
Length of output: 235
.github/workflows/build-image.yml (1)
5-5: LGTM! Good security practice for PRs.
Adding PR trigger allows testing builds before merge, which helps catch issues early.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor